<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.1.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Update: Jones Soda Cream Soda (Pure Cane Soda Version)</title>
	<link>http://www.bevreview.com/2007/06/18/update-jones-soda-cream-soda-pure-cane-soda-version/</link>
	<description>Beverage reviews cooked up with ChefTalk.com</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 11:49:07 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.1.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: BevReview.com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Review: Jones Soda Cream Soda (Pure Cane Soda Version)</title>
		<link>http://www.bevreview.com/2007/06/18/update-jones-soda-cream-soda-pure-cane-soda-version/#comment-1014</link>
		<author>BevReview.com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Review: Jones Soda Cream Soda (Pure Cane Soda Version)</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2007 00:06:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bevreview.com/2007/06/18/update-jones-soda-cream-soda-pure-cane-soda-version/#comment-1014</guid>
					<description>[...] I&#8217;m no scientist, but this would seem to indicate that Jones&#8217; version of &#8220;pure cane sugar&#8221; leans more on the sucrose end of the spectrum, while HCFS obviously hints towards fructose. I&#8217;ve no clue what that means. In fact, from what I&#8217;ve been able to search online, it seems that there is not much difference in the way the body breaks down sucrose vs. HFCS. So is this whole change over to &#8220;Pure Cane Soda&#8221; a clever marketing sham? Or is there actual science to support it? Enquiring minds want to know! (UPDATE: A reader chimes in with more explanation.) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] I'm no scientist, but this would seem to indicate that Jones' version of "pure cane sugar" leans more on the sucrose end of the spectrum, while HCFS obviously hints towards fructose. I've no clue what that means. In fact, from what I've been able to search online, it seems that there is not much difference in the way the body breaks down sucrose vs. HFCS. So is this whole change over to "Pure Cane Soda" a clever marketing sham? Or is there actual science to support it? Enquiring minds want to know! (UPDATE: A reader chimes in with more explanation.) [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jones Soda - Hfcs Vs Inverted Corn - ChefTalk Cooking Forums</title>
		<link>http://www.bevreview.com/2007/06/18/update-jones-soda-cream-soda-pure-cane-soda-version/#comment-1254</link>
		<author>Jones Soda - Hfcs Vs Inverted Corn - ChefTalk Cooking Forums</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2007 20:54:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bevreview.com/2007/06/18/update-jones-soda-cream-soda-pure-cane-soda-version/#comment-1254</guid>
					<description>[...] had a biology/chem person e-mail me about this topic a while back. With their permission, I posted their comments. Perhaps that would help this [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] had a biology/chem person e-mail me about this topic a while back. With their permission, I posted their comments. Perhaps that would help this [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David  Hardingham</title>
		<link>http://www.bevreview.com/2007/06/18/update-jones-soda-cream-soda-pure-cane-soda-version/#comment-13157</link>
		<author>David  Hardingham</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 02:53:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bevreview.com/2007/06/18/update-jones-soda-cream-soda-pure-cane-soda-version/#comment-13157</guid>
					<description>it the free fructose which is causing al the problem HFCS so it also a same problem with fructose crystalline fructose and  inverted sugar
so jones inverted sugar is just as bad as HFCS</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>it the free fructose which is causing al the problem HFCS so it also a same problem with fructose crystalline fructose and  inverted sugar<br />
so jones inverted sugar is just as bad as HFCS</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
