<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.1.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Rumor: Sierra Mist Undercover Orange / Sierra Mist Free Undercover Orange</title>
	<link>http://www.bevreview.com/2007/12/14/rumor-sierra-mist-undercover-orange-sierra-mist-free-undercover-orange/</link>
	<description>Beverage reviews cooked up with ChefTalk.com</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 03:56:29 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.1.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: BevBoard</title>
		<link>http://www.bevreview.com/2007/12/14/rumor-sierra-mist-undercover-orange-sierra-mist-free-undercover-orange/#comment-2503</link>
		<author>BevBoard</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2008 21:11:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bevreview.com/2007/12/14/rumor-sierra-mist-undercover-orange-sierra-mist-free-undercover-orange/#comment-2503</guid>
					<description>&lt;strong&gt;Pepsi News: Amp expansion and Slice to Return...&lt;/strong&gt;

Adding to the Amp orange/grape rumors, on December 19, 2007, Pepsi filed to protect the trademark of Amp Energy Elevate, with the associated logo in black/white...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Pepsi News: Amp expansion and Slice to Return&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Adding to the Amp orange/grape rumors, on December 19, 2007, Pepsi filed to protect the trademark of Amp Energy Elevate, with the associated logo in black/white&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
